Choosing a Market for European Expansion: Spain vs UK vs Poland vs Germany vs Switzerland
Compare Spain, the UK, Poland, Germany and Switzerland for European expansion: talent, customers, cost, speed, regulation and a practical scoring method.

Choosing your first European market is a strategic decision that shapes hiring, cost, tax and how quickly you reach customers. Among the markets we work in, five come up again and again: Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Germany and Switzerland. Each is the right answer for a different kind of company. This guide compares them on the factors that actually matter, without pretending there is a single winner.
Start with the question, not the country
Before comparing countries, answer four questions:
- Where are your customers? Proximity to buyers often outweighs any tax difference.
- What do you need to hire? Sales, engineering, operations or management talent are distributed differently.
- How much substance do you need? A legal entity with a real team is very different from a sales presence.
- What is your time horizon? A test market and a regional headquarters call for different choices.
Spain: talent, lifestyle and a gateway to Latin America
Strengths
- Attractive for international talent, which helps hiring and relocation.
- Strong cities for hubs: Madrid for headquarters and corporate clients, Barcelona and Valencia for tech and creative teams, Málaga as a growing tech location.
- Cultural and language bridge to Latin America.
- The SL is flexible and the minimum capital is low.
Watch-outs
- Administrative processes can be slow; document legalisation and NIE timing need planning.
- Employment law is protective; dismissal costs and procedures must be understood upfront.
Best for: talent hubs, Southern European sales, companies with Latin American ambitions. Read: How to set up an SL in Spain.
United Kingdom: speed, finance and English-language markets
Strengths
- Very fast company formation and a familiar common-law framework.
- Deep financial, legal and investor ecosystem, especially in London.
- English-language market and a natural bridge to the US.
Watch-outs
- Outside the EU since Brexit: a UK company does not give single-market access, and moving goods or people into the EU adds friction.
- Immigration for non-UK staff requires sponsorship in most cases.
Best for: fundraising, financial services, English-language B2B, US-facing companies. Read: UK Ltd formation for non-residents.
Poland: scale, engineering and cost-efficient operations
Strengths
- Large, highly skilled engineering and shared-services talent pool.
- Competitive operating costs within the EU.
- EU member: full single-market access with an sp. z o.o.
Watch-outs
- Polish-language administration and frequently updated tax rules.
- Competition for senior technical talent in major cities.
Best for: engineering centres, back office and shared services, Central and Eastern European sales. Read: Setting up an sp. z o.o..
Germany: the largest market in the EU
Strengths
- Europe’s largest economy and a demanding, high-value customer base.
- Industrial, automotive, engineering and Mittelstand clients.
- Strong credibility of a German GmbH.
Watch-outs
- More formal processes: notarisation, higher capital, German-language business culture.
- Trade tax varies by municipality; employment and works council rules require care.
Best for: selling to German industry and enterprises, DACH expansion. Read: German GmbH setup.
Switzerland: stability, finance and high-value services
Strengths
- Political and legal stability, strong financial sector.
- Competitive taxation in many cantons.
- Attractive for holding, trading, wealth and high-value service companies.
Watch-outs
- High operating and salary costs.
- At least one Swiss-resident representative is required; non-EU permits are limited.
- Not an EU member: specific bilateral agreements apply.
Best for: holdings, regional headquarters, finance and premium services. Read: Swiss GmbH or AG.
A practical way to decide
Score each market from 1 to 5 against your own weighted criteria:
- customer access;
- talent availability for your critical roles;
- total cost (salaries, offices, advisers);
- time to operate (entity, bank, permits);
- regulatory fit for your sector;
- tax and substance (with professional advice);
- leadership’s ability to be present.
Most companies end up with a two-country answer: one market for customers and one for talent or headquarters. That is often more realistic than forcing everything into one jurisdiction.
And the US?
Many European companies run their European entity alongside a US company. If American customers or payment rails matter, see our guide to US LLC formation for non-residents or our dedicated service at llc.focalygroup.com.
Entry models compared
| Model | What it is | Good for | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distributor or agent | a local partner sells for you | testing demand with little commitment | less control over brand and pricing |
| Employer of Record (EOR) | a provider employs staff on your behalf | first hires before an entity exists | cost per head, permanent-establishment risk if staff conclude contracts |
| Branch | a registered extension of the parent | single projects, quick presence | parent fully liable; local accounting still required |
| Subsidiary | a local company (SL, Ltd, sp. z o.o., GmbH, AG) | hiring teams, local contracts, credibility | formation effort and ongoing compliance |
Many groups move through these in sequence: an EOR or distributor first, then a subsidiary once revenue or headcount justifies it.
A scoring sheet you can use
Rate each country from 1 to 5 against criteria weighted for your goal: access to the customers you sell to; availability of the roles you need; language and time-zone fit with headquarters; formation and compliance effort; total employment cost; tax and incentives (confirmed with an adviser); and ease of moving key people. The point is not the total but the conversation it forces about what matters most.
A phased roadmap
- Validate demand with remote sales, partners or events.
- Hire the first people through an EOR or a lean entity.
- Incorporate in the market that wins your scoring.
- Add a second market once processes, contracts and payroll are repeatable.
A common pattern is two locations: one close to customers (Germany for DACH, the UK for English-speaking markets) and one for teams and operations, often Poland or Spain, with Switzerland chosen for holding or premium-service functions backed by real substance.
Key terms
- EOR: a provider that employs staff on your behalf.
- Permanent establishment: a taxable presence created by local activity.
- Transfer pricing: pricing of transactions between group companies.
Official sources
- EU single market information for businesses: europa.eu/youreurope/business
- UK Government, setting up a business: gov.uk/set-up-business
- Swiss SME portal: kmu.admin.ch
How Focaly Group helps
Our Business Consulting practice runs market-entry assessments, and Company Formation & Expansion turns the decision into a working entity, with HR & Relocation handling hiring and moving people.
Frequently asked questions
Which European country is best to set up a company?
There is no universal answer. Spain suits talent hubs, the UK suits finance and English-language markets, Poland suits engineering and operations, Germany suits selling to German industry and Switzerland suits holdings and high-value services.
Is the UK still a good base for EU business?
For EU-heavy activity, a company in an EU member state usually works better. The UK remains strong for finance, fundraising and English-language markets.
Which market is the most cost-efficient for an EU team?
Poland is often chosen for cost-efficient engineering and shared services; Spain is popular for broader talent hubs. Total cost depends on roles and cities.
Can I start with one country and add others later?
Yes. Many companies start with one entity and add a second for talent or sales once the first is running.
Do I need a local entity to hire in another country?
Usually yes for regular employment, although employer-of-record services can bridge the gap for a limited period.


